Attorneys for Donald Trump argued against the release of additional evidence in the former president's federal election interference case in the lead up to Election Day.

Judge Tanya Chutkan made public portions of a filing by prosecutors setting out their argument for why the case should go forward despite the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity.

New court papers pull back the curtain on Trump’s conversations in the weeks leading up to the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Judge Chutkan's order was stayed for a week to let Trump's team "evaluate litigation options" before evidence is made public.

Also, Biden ordered 1,000 troops to help areas destroyed by Helene. Here’s the latest at the end of Wednesday.

The ex-president’s lawyers said Trump wants to “evaluate litigation options” if any other evidence against him is set to be released.

AS SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH SUMS IT UP in his 165-page immunity brief, the Supreme Court held in Trump v. U.S. that “former presidents are immune from prosecution for core official acts, enjoy at least a rebuttable presumption of immunity for other official acts,

Special counsel Jack Smith should not release more evidence in his case against former President Donald Trump during early voting, defense attorneys told the judge in a filing Thursday. Allowing Smith to release the appendix attached to his motion on presidential immunity,